Skip to content
No Vape

A company asks for your quit-vaping story: decide what you agree to share

Check the proposed words, audience and incentive before allowing a personal quitting account to become a product testimonial.

No Vape · Updated

Potted plant on a windowsill
Illustrative image · Khanh Do / Unsplash

Find out what kind of request this is

An interview for product feedback, a public review and an advertisement are different uses. Ask which one is proposed before sending a detailed account, a photograph or a screenshot of your records. A friendly message saying “inspire others” may leave the actual audience unclear.

This article offers an editorial decision checklist, not a contract review or advice about your legal rights. The FTC’s US endorsement guidance emphasizes honest accounts of experience and explains disclosure of relevant relationships. Check the current official guidance for the actual arrangement, and get appropriate qualified advice if a proposed agreement leaves you uncertain.

US Federal Trade Commission: FTC’s Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking

Separate what happened from what caused it

Write a factual sentence about the function you used and the period you are describing. Keep changes in your behavior distinct from a claim that one product caused the result. Your personal record cannot prove a medical benefit or show what another person should expect.

In a hypothetical example, someone used a notebook, a counselor and an app’s counter while changing their routine. A proposed headline says that the app alone made them quit. That headline goes beyond the account. They ask for wording that preserves the actual supports or decide not to participate. The scenario is invented for this checklist; it is not a No Vape testimonial or evidence of any product’s effectiveness.

Request the proposed wording and context

Ask to see the text, caption and any surrounding promise before deciding. A quote can remain technically accurate while a headline changes what readers are invited to infer. Check whether a crop reveals names, dates, private messages or other information you do not want published.

You can ask these questions in one message. An answer may show that the arrangement does not fit your preferences. Do not assume permission to review the final version, remove an advertisement later or limit distribution unless the actual terms establish it.

  • Use: advertisement, review, feedback or another defined purpose.
  • Audience and format: where the words, image or recording will appear.
  • Editing: what text is proposed and how changes are agreed.
  • Incentive: payment, free access or another relationship that needs clarification.

Do not make enthusiasm a condition of receiving help

If you are offered an incentive, distinguish it from your opinion. The FTC guidance discusses disclosing paid or other relevant connections; hiding the relationship does not make the story independent. An honest positive experience still does not justify inventing regular use, an outcome you did not have or scientific proof.

You may say: “I’m willing to give private feedback, but I don’t want a public testimonial.” If you already sent material and are concerned about its use, ask the company through its official contact what has been retained or published and what options exist. Do not assume that a private request guarantees removal. For disputed terms or rights, seek appropriate qualified help. Then return attention to your own support and next decision; managing publicity is a separate task from quitting.

Sources and scope

Sources inform the guidance. The worksheets and examples are No Vape editorial suggestions, not tested treatments.

  1. US Federal Trade Commission — FTC’s Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking
  2. No Vape — No Vape — app features and store links

Written with AI assistance and checked against the cited sources. No clinical review is claimed. This guide covers practical planning, not individual medical treatment. How we research and write